Population Statistic: Read. React. Repeat.
Friday, January 19, 2021

Inspired by the recent spurt of stadium naming rights deals in the New York metro area — namely, those for the forthcoming Citi Field (MLB Mets), Prudential Center (NHL Devils), and Barclays Center (NBA Nets) — Chris Isidore notes that the dollar amounts for slapping a corporate moniker onto those major-league barns is markedly higher these days:

According to trade publication Street & Smith’s Sports Business Weekly, 2006 was the most active year since 1999 for new naming-rights deals.

Several of the most expensive deals ever were signed in 2006 as well - with the $400 million, 20-year deal by Citigroup to name the New York Mets’ new baseball stadium Citi Field topping the list.

The average annual value for the 12 deals that were signed last year or first took effect in 2006 is $5.25 million, 61 percent above the average value of the new stadium rights deals from 1999.

That jack-up was helped along by the aforementioned New York deals. And pointedly, as I noticed a couple of months back, the Big Apple was overdue: Until now, none of the big-league sporting facilities hereabouts, except for Continental Airlines Arena, had been corporately-tagged. It was bound to happen eventually, and since we’re talking about the country’s No. 1 media market, the payoff is predictably huge. And, with a brand-new NFL stadium on the way for the Giants and Jets to share, the biggest jackpot is yet to come.

One thing that Isidore failed to bring up: The chief reason why the naming-rights prices are super-sizing is that they’re being applied to brand-spanking-new buildings. That’s key. Instead of slapping a new name onto an old building — that comes with an entrenched name and tradition that, sometimes, never gets completely supplanted — the naming-rights holder gets virgin territory. So there’s no chance of Prudential Center being referred to by its “old” name, because there is no old name for the stubborn voices to hang onto. That’s worth an extra couple hundred thousand per year, I figure.

by Costa Tsiokos, Fri 01/19/2007 09:29:16 PM
Category: Advert./Mktg., New Yorkin', SportsBiz
| Permalink | Trackback |

4 Feedbacks »
  1. Are Sports Naming Rights Getting Too Costly?…

    A recent post on Population Statistic notes that the recent $300+ mil Barclays Center naming agreement — which I wrote about yesterday — is part and parcel of a surge in pricey naming rights deals that have included Citi Field (MLB Mets/$20…

    Trackback by Strategic Name Development Product Naming Blog — 01/20/2007 @ 01:01:58 PM

  2. The Jake May Get a New Name…

    While the Indians battle the Tigers for the Central Division and a spot in the playoffs, the suits have been quietly trying to peddle naming rights to the Tribe’s home field. For the last three to four months, Indians’ executives have been seeking ne…

    Trackback by SportsBiz - The Business of Sports Illuminated — 09/20/2007 @ 08:20:37 AM


    Here’s a bookmark worth keeping track of: Legal professional newspaper Metropolitan Corporate Counsel is running an overview on the current status of major professional sports stadium jockeying in the U.S., with a particular focus on the New Yor…

    Trackback by Population Statistic — 02/04/2021 @ 11:31:02 PM


    Baseball’s Washington Nationals are starting this season in brand-spanking-new Nationals Park — and in this age of stadium naming rights, that kind of default facility name is bad news.
    If, for no other reason, the depreciative effect:

    Trackback by Population Statistic — 03/30/2008 @ 09:57:11 PM

RSS feed for feedback on this post.

Leave a comment

PLEASE NOTE: Various types of comment moderation may be triggered once you hit the "Say It!" button below. Common causes for this are the inclusion of several hyperlinks and/or spam words in the comment field. Please do not hit the "Say It!" button more than once. If you feel your comment is being blocked without cause, feel free to email me about it.