<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LIKE, OMG, YAHOO!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2009/07/04/like-omg-yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2009/07/04/like-omg-yahoo/</link>
	<description>Read. React. Repeat.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:57:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Population Statistic</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2009/07/04/like-omg-yahoo/#comment-398752</link>
		<dc:creator>Population Statistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/?p=5784#comment-398752</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;AN EDGIER OMG...&lt;/strong&gt;

While dissecting yesterday&#8217;s news about how Yahoo&#8217;s omg! is now the leading gossip site based on Web traffic, I pretty well rejected the premise that this success was due to a less-snarky &#8220;positive&#8221; tone in its coverage.
But, fo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AN EDGIER OMG&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>While dissecting yesterday&#8217;s news about how Yahoo&#8217;s omg! is now the leading gossip site based on Web traffic, I pretty well rejected the premise that this success was due to a less-snarky &#8220;positive&#8221; tone in its coverage.<br />
But, fo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
