Population Statistic: Read. React. Repeat.
Saturday, June 13, 2009

General Motors is hard-spinning its bankruptcy as a positive revitalization for the venerable brand. But apparently, one way being contemplated to complete the reinvention is by ditching the now-tainted name “General Motors” altogether.

GM is already starting to rename parts of its business. Its investment-management arm, General Motors Asset Management, is now Promark Global Advisors. The banking arm of auto finance company GMAC Financial Services last month changed its name to Ally Bank.

And, on paper at least, the “new GM” — separated from the “old GM” in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy process — is already operating under a different name in court filings: Auto Acquisition Corp.

Not that keeping the GM nameplate up for public-opinion target practice isn’t paying off:

Allowing the GM name to take the heat makes it a kind of shield for its individual brands, such as Chevrolet, GMC, Cadillac and Buick, that are more closely associated with individual cars, Mike DiGiovanni, GM’s executive director of global market and industry analysis, said during a monthly sales conference call in April.

“What we’re seeing is the GM brand gets dinged big time in terms of considering a GM vehicle,” he said. “But when you look at Chevrolet, Cadillac and our other brands, they haven’t changed.”

But sooner or later, that umbrella-brand flak-jacket’s probably going to have to go. Probably for the best, too. Such a generic, monolithic word combination hearkens back to 19th-Century naming conventions, ala Standard Oil (now ExxonMobil). Here are a few humble suggestions for a new automotive identity:

GenMo - A shortening of the current name, tailored for today’s shorter attention spans. Preserves the equity of decades’ worth of branding, while making it that much easier for disgruntled customers/employees/creditors to spit out as a curse.

Admiral Motors - Preserving the military-ranking motif, which, while not intentional, is probably wrongly assumed as such by a good chunk of customers out there. If you can’t win on land, take to the sea! Plus, it’s in line with the subliminal car model naming convention of suggesting positive qualities: Integra for “integrity”, Supra for “super” or “superb”, and thus “Admiral” to evoke “admirable”.

Autovate - Automobiles + innovate. Or motivate. That’s the ticket!

FaceCar - Because everyone’s on Facebook, right? May require that the social networking site to agree to a shotgun merger with the carmaker, thus causing FB to surrender a big chunk of that $10-billion valuation (as though it actually existed).

by Costa Tsiokos, Sat 06/13/2009 05:22 PM
Category: Advert./Mktg., Business
| Permalink | Trackback |

4 Feedbacks »
  1. [...] how about GenMo? A shortening of the current name, tailored for today’s shorter attention spans. Preserves [...]

    Pingback by dustbury.com » New brands for old — 06/14/2009 @ 10:21 PM

  2. Since the focus seems to be geared in the direction of Chevrolets, Buicks and Cadillacs, it would seem that you would pick something that would represent that notion. GMC has always stood for cars of significant American quality and to change to a name that only sounds more like “Investment Hounds” are taking over, would slowly but surely turn those loyal to the GMC name away. And, if you must eliminate the Pontiac brands, at least, incorporate some of the styles in with the other car models. Personally, I would stick with simplicity in the name change; something like “CBC, Incorporated”. Just commenting!

    Comment by Belinda Ware — 06/15/2009 @ 11:00 AM

  3. @Belinda: Glad you did comment! Popular opinion, according to Automotive News, goes with names that preserve continuity and/or capitalizes on model brands. So “Chevy Inc.”, “The Cadillac Motor Car Co.” etc. Can’t say I care one way or the other.

    Comment by CT — 06/15/2009 @ 11:37 AM

  4. GM Shouldn’t Change Its Company Name!…

    GM has been the butt of many jokes lately, with some referring to it as Generous Motors, Government Motors, General Makeover, etc… Conventional wisdom is that General Motors should change its name. I disagree. Chrysler is a company name and a car nam…

    Trackback by Name Wire: The Product Naming Blog — 06/18/2009 @ 1:57 PM

RSS feed for feedback on this post.

Say something! (with optional tweeting)


Comment moderation might kick in, so please do not hit the "Say It!" button more than once.

Twitter

Send To Twitter

(Don't worry, your Twitter Name/Password is NOT saved.)