<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE QUEENS ISLANDERS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2009/03/30/the-queens-islanders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2009/03/30/the-queens-islanders/</link>
	<description>Read. React. Repeat.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:25:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2009/03/30/the-queens-islanders/#comment-388923</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/?p=5104#comment-388923</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I guess I should have clarified the east-west split within Queens: Closer to Manhattan and Brooklyn remains more urban, while the nearer to the Nassau line things tend to blend. In the back of my mind was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2008/10/11/from-republican-to-democrat-in-the-first-suburbs/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the morphing urbanization of Nassau and other &quot;first suburbs&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.

Also, something I should have included but didn&#039;t: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ericmcerlain.com/offwingopinion/archives/005156.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Suffolk County was in the Isles&#039; sights three years ago&lt;/a&gt;, which I thought was a daft move, regardless of Suffolk&#039;s population. Funny how they&#039;ve now done an almost-literal 180, from west to east.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I guess I should have clarified the east-west split within Queens: Closer to Manhattan and Brooklyn remains more urban, while the nearer to the Nassau line things tend to blend. In the back of my mind was <a href="http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2008/10/11/from-republican-to-democrat-in-the-first-suburbs/" rel="nofollow">the morphing urbanization of Nassau and other &#8220;first suburbs&#8221;</a>.</p>
<p>Also, something I should have included but didn&#8217;t: <a href="http://www.ericmcerlain.com/offwingopinion/archives/005156.php" rel="nofollow">Suffolk County was in the Isles&#8217; sights three years ago</a>, which I thought was a daft move, regardless of Suffolk&#8217;s population. Funny how they&#8217;ve now done an almost-literal 180, from west to east.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2009/03/30/the-queens-islanders/#comment-388899</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 04:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/?p=5104#comment-388899</guid>
		<description>Oh, as for the hockey - Queens is a more viable move than KC, especially due to the tv contract.  This still all feels like political posturing more than anything else though.  Subway access is nice, but it&#039;s LIRR access that would be key.  As for guaranteeing sellouts vs the Rangers, that happens already.

A better team in the coming seasons won&#039;t hurt either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, as for the hockey &#8211; Queens is a more viable move than KC, especially due to the tv contract.  This still all feels like political posturing more than anything else though.  Subway access is nice, but it&#8217;s LIRR access that would be key.  As for guaranteeing sellouts vs the Rangers, that happens already.</p>
<p>A better team in the coming seasons won&#8217;t hurt either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2009/03/30/the-queens-islanders/#comment-388898</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 04:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/?p=5104#comment-388898</guid>
		<description>Queens is suburban only when compared to Manhattan.  Small parts of it are definitely &#039;burbish, and a few Nassau parts can compare, but not many, and it&#039;s only because it&#039;s in the shadow of skyscrapers.

On its own, it&#039;s more city than most cities in the country.

I&#039;m currently holed up in one of the most suburban parts (with Nassau literally blocks away).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Queens is suburban only when compared to Manhattan.  Small parts of it are definitely &#8216;burbish, and a few Nassau parts can compare, but not many, and it&#8217;s only because it&#8217;s in the shadow of skyscrapers.</p>
<p>On its own, it&#8217;s more city than most cities in the country.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m currently holed up in one of the most suburban parts (with Nassau literally blocks away).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
