<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE GREAT LONELYGIRL15 DEBATE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/</link>
	<description>Read. React. Repeat.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:44:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LonelyGirl Fraud Links &#171; Just Add Water and Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-345478</link>
		<dc:creator>LonelyGirl Fraud Links &#171; Just Add Water and Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-345478</guid>
		<description>[...] I wanted to see what other people thought about lonely girl and these are a few sites that talk about it. There is a link to a video clip that shows how the lighting was off and you can tell it was being taped. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wanted to see what other people thought about lonely girl and these are a few sites that talk about it. There is a link to a video clip that shows how the lighting was off and you can tell it was being taped. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Population Statistic</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-218959</link>
		<dc:creator>Population Statistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 03:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-218959</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PLACING PRODUCT ON LONELYGIRL15...&lt;/strong&gt;


Yes, Lonelygirl15 is still around. And now, her vlog entries feature blatantly overt product placement advertisements.
I guess it&#8217;s official: There&#8217;s nothing left to believe in.
I haven&#8217;t kept up with LG15 developments since the enti...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PLACING PRODUCT ON LONELYGIRL15&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Yes, Lonelygirl15 is still around. And now, her vlog entries feature blatantly overt product placement advertisements.<br />
I guess it&#8217;s official: There&#8217;s nothing left to believe in.<br />
I haven&#8217;t kept up with LG15 developments since the enti&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Population Statistic</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-111828</link>
		<dc:creator>Population Statistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 03:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-111828</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;LONELYGIRL15: THE FINAL INSULT&lt;/strong&gt;

	
I know I already declared the cover blown on the whole lonelygirl15 thang. But that was only the veracity of the premise.
	Now, the actual schemers have come forward, confirming that it was a stab at building audience for a proposed movie/series. It ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>LONELYGIRL15: THE FINAL INSULT</strong></p>
<p>I know I already declared the cover blown on the whole lonelygirl15 thang. But that was only the veracity of the premise.<br />
	Now, the actual schemers have come forward, confirming that it was a stab at building audience for a proposed movie/series. It &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Population Statistic</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-111165</link>
		<dc:creator>Population Statistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 02:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-111165</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;LONELYGIRL15 SQUELCHED, BUT NOT THE DEBATE&lt;/strong&gt;

	
The lid was bound to be blown off sooner or later. YouTube&#8217;s lonelygirl15 apparently has been revealed to be some sort of viral marketing production.
	I say &#8220;apparently&#8221; because, as with all such conspiracy-fueled topics, this could...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>LONELYGIRL15 SQUELCHED, BUT NOT THE DEBATE</strong></p>
<p>The lid was bound to be blown off sooner or later. YouTube&#8217;s lonelygirl15 apparently has been revealed to be some sort of viral marketing production.<br />
	I say &#8220;apparently&#8221; because, as with all such conspiracy-fueled topics, this could&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanjula</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-110721</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanjula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 20:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-110721</guid>
		<description>Who cares? This girl is more real than Paris Hilton, whose videos are also on youtube and for whom we may be able to locate a birth certificate but who is as plastic as they come. Real, scripted, whatever it may be, this far more interesting and engaging than the garbage on the boob tube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares? This girl is more real than Paris Hilton, whose videos are also on youtube and for whom we may be able to locate a birth certificate but who is as plastic as they come. Real, scripted, whatever it may be, this far more interesting and engaging than the garbage on the boob tube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lance mcdaniel</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-110338</link>
		<dc:creator>lance mcdaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 19:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-110338</guid>
		<description>it is fleming as much as he would lik eto deny....his new movie about teen girl is named danielle (daniel) now follow Bree&#039;s interest&#039;s

Check out this 1974 commencement address to cal tech..truth must come out, etc..


http://www.physics.brocku.ca/etc/cargo_cult_science.html

 homeschooled bree would never know this…..


or where you find both men mentioned in a blog ? www.ncf.ca/~ek867/2004_05_01-15_archives.html - 273k - Cached –


vision-nary.com/weblogs/index.php?cat=17 - 58k - Sep 6, 2006

 
who is david raffin?  http://davidraffin.com/Home.html  which takes you to … http://vision-nary.com/weblogs/index.php/film

  which if you look on the left side even brian fleming is linked are linked under film

but somehow I then got to Robert Madrigal ‘s myspace account and guess what he is an Artist/filmmaker in Southern California. Ran a digital film/television production company-slash-artist-collective for several years, (directing/producing digital shorts/music videos/features/working on projects in various mediums with other artists) until 2002  Storytelling, film &amp; other visual storytelling mediums(comic books, picture books, animation, artistic ends of video games), physics, abstraction and conversation. Human existence is narrative, so I&#039;ve devoted my life to narrative art, which means my life is also my art. I Heart New Scientist magazine,
 
 but madigral is related to Al madrigal who is represented by CAA....who also posted to youtube under ..well you guys can go from there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is fleming as much as he would lik eto deny&#8230;.his new movie about teen girl is named danielle (daniel) now follow Bree&#8217;s interest&#8217;s</p>
<p>Check out this 1974 commencement address to cal tech..truth must come out, etc..</p>
<p><a href="http://www.physics.brocku.ca/etc/cargo_cult_science.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.physics.brocku.ca/etc/cargo_cult_science.html</a></p>
<p> homeschooled bree would never know this…..</p>
<p>or where you find both men mentioned in a blog ? <a href="http://www.ncf.ca/~ek867/2004_05_01-15_archives.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncf.ca/~ek867/2004_05_01-15_archives.html</a> &#8211; 273k &#8211; Cached –</p>
<p>vision-nary.com/weblogs/index.php?cat=17 &#8211; 58k &#8211; Sep 6, 2006</p>
<p>who is david raffin?  <a href="http://davidraffin.com/Home.html" rel="nofollow">http://davidraffin.com/Home.html</a>  which takes you to … <a href="http://vision-nary.com/weblogs/index.php/film" rel="nofollow">http://vision-nary.com/weblogs/index.php/film</a></p>
<p>  which if you look on the left side even brian fleming is linked are linked under film</p>
<p>but somehow I then got to Robert Madrigal ‘s myspace account and guess what he is an Artist/filmmaker in Southern California. Ran a digital film/television production company-slash-artist-collective for several years, (directing/producing digital shorts/music videos/features/working on projects in various mediums with other artists) until 2002  Storytelling, film &amp; other visual storytelling mediums(comic books, picture books, animation, artistic ends of video games), physics, abstraction and conversation. Human existence is narrative, so I&#8217;ve devoted my life to narrative art, which means my life is also my art. I Heart New Scientist magazine,</p>
<p> but madigral is related to Al madrigal who is represented by CAA&#8230;.who also posted to youtube under ..well you guys can go from there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim in tampa</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-110312</link>
		<dc:creator>tim in tampa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 16:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-110312</guid>
		<description>To finally close off this thread, the creators posted on the lonelygirl15.com domain today that it&#039;s all a hoax. This is pretty much after some intrepid reporters busted the whole thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To finally close off this thread, the creators posted on the lonelygirl15.com domain today that it&#8217;s all a hoax. This is pretty much after some intrepid reporters busted the whole thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q Manning</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-110295</link>
		<dc:creator>Q Manning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 14:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-110295</guid>
		<description>As a filmmaker, I can tell you its fake. Watch ANY OTHER &quot;web video&quot; and you&#039;ll notice shit lighting, shit frame rate, and shit audio. 

Lonely girl 15 MAY be done by two teenage kids. That&#039;s entirely possible. But it&#039;s not done by some 16 year old girl and her friend, under the noses of her parents. The lighting rigs alone would spike electrical bills, put out enough heat, and would have been too conspicuous to hide. 

Lighting gives it away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a filmmaker, I can tell you its fake. Watch ANY OTHER &#8220;web video&#8221; and you&#8217;ll notice shit lighting, shit frame rate, and shit audio. </p>
<p>Lonely girl 15 MAY be done by two teenage kids. That&#8217;s entirely possible. But it&#8217;s not done by some 16 year old girl and her friend, under the noses of her parents. The lighting rigs alone would spike electrical bills, put out enough heat, and would have been too conspicuous to hide. </p>
<p>Lighting gives it away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-107929</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 17:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-107929</guid>
		<description>She is not a fake. You all need to get a life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is not a fake. You all need to get a life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brady</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-107198</link>
		<dc:creator>Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 09:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-107198</guid>
		<description>Brilliant! Somehow, I&#039;ve only just stumbled across the lonelygirl phenomenon in the last hour, but I&#039;ve been hooked on watching an episode, reading the debate, watching another, so on...
Definitely fake. Fake and brilliant. I don&#039;t think you&#039;ll ever see an MTV or direct product tie-in. There&#039;s adspace two inches above the damn video player onscreen! The last one I watched had an Ask.com banner flashing away. Each click on that page, cha-ching cha-ching cha-ching!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant! Somehow, I&#8217;ve only just stumbled across the lonelygirl phenomenon in the last hour, but I&#8217;ve been hooked on watching an episode, reading the debate, watching another, so on&#8230;<br />
Definitely fake. Fake and brilliant. I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll ever see an MTV or direct product tie-in. There&#8217;s adspace two inches above the damn video player onscreen! The last one I watched had an Ask.com banner flashing away. Each click on that page, cha-ching cha-ching cha-ching!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soror YZBL</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-106250</link>
		<dc:creator>Soror YZBL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 04:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-106250</guid>
		<description>93

As a follower of the Aleister Crowley&#039;s teachings, I can say that if the mystery religion was Thelema, the whole thing is terribly fake.  Thelemic parents, while they might homeschool, wouldn&#039;t be strict at all.  

&quot;The word of Sin is Restriction&quot; - Liber AL I:41.  

Thelemic parents, the ones I know, at least, pretty much let their kids do whatever they want.

93 93/93</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>93</p>
<p>As a follower of the Aleister Crowley&#8217;s teachings, I can say that if the mystery religion was Thelema, the whole thing is terribly fake.  Thelemic parents, while they might homeschool, wouldn&#8217;t be strict at all.  </p>
<p>&#8220;The word of Sin is Restriction&#8221; &#8211; Liber AL I:41.  </p>
<p>Thelemic parents, the ones I know, at least, pretty much let their kids do whatever they want.</p>
<p>93 93/93</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Flemming: lonelygirl15 jumps the shark &#171; remotedevice</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-106105</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Flemming: lonelygirl15 jumps the shark &#171; remotedevice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-106105</guid>
		<description>[...] YouTube is a conversation. The Bree videos so far all could have been shot within the span of one or two days. That may work financially for the production, but it wreaks havoc on verisimilitude. If the lonelygirl15 saga were real, Bree and Daniel would be far more specific in responding to the comments of other YouTubers. In fact, Bree mentioned specific YouTube denizens in her first videoblog post, but she hasn&#8217;t mentioned a single YouTube user in the weeks since &#8212; even though many users have posted response videos. She and Daniel only make vague references like &#8220;you guys were asking about&#8230;&#8221; Not good enough. If Bree and Daniel existed in real time, they&#8217;d be referencing specific comments and videos, both inside and outside YouTube. It was a serious mistake not to have Bree available 24/7 during the run of the YouTube episodes. (slumdance.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] YouTube is a conversation. The Bree videos so far all could have been shot within the span of one or two days. That may work financially for the production, but it wreaks havoc on verisimilitude. If the lonelygirl15 saga were real, Bree and Daniel would be far more specific in responding to the comments of other YouTubers. In fact, Bree mentioned specific YouTube denizens in her first videoblog post, but she hasn&#8217;t mentioned a single YouTube user in the weeks since &#8212; even though many users have posted response videos. She and Daniel only make vague references like &#8220;you guys were asking about&#8230;&#8221; Not good enough. If Bree and Daniel existed in real time, they&#8217;d be referencing specific comments and videos, both inside and outside YouTube. It was a serious mistake not to have Bree available 24/7 during the run of the YouTube episodes. (slumdance.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Temmer</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-104504</link>
		<dc:creator>Temmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 05:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-104504</guid>
		<description>I know from an inside source that LG15 is going to be interviewed on national TV right after Labor Day. Stay tuned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know from an inside source that LG15 is going to be interviewed on national TV right after Labor Day. Stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-103119</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-103119</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to know the type of webcam she uses for her videos, Anyways, look at when her latest video was upload, then take a look at Daniel&#039;s latest video. They&#039;re about 2 hrs apart (the play video). So these videos have been recorded before, or it is all a hoax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to know the type of webcam she uses for her videos, Anyways, look at when her latest video was upload, then take a look at Daniel&#8217;s latest video. They&#8217;re about 2 hrs apart (the play video). So these videos have been recorded before, or it is all a hoax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-101073</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-101073</guid>
		<description>Fredo,

http://www.happycatcorp.com/images/LG15.JPG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fredo,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.happycatcorp.com/images/LG15.JPG" rel="nofollow">http://www.happycatcorp.com/images/LG15.JPG</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fredo</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-101017</link>
		<dc:creator>fredo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-101017</guid>
		<description>This is awesome, especially the Aleister Crowley stuff! Does anyone have an image of lonelygirl with the Crowley shrine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awesome, especially the Aleister Crowley stuff! Does anyone have an image of lonelygirl with the Crowley shrine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-100698</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-100698</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’m still betting on this being résumé work for some television production hopefuls, looking to score a job at a youth-oriented network.&quot;

Brilliant.  The LG15 vlog makes complete sense now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m still betting on this being résumé work for some television production hopefuls, looking to score a job at a youth-oriented network.&#8221;</p>
<p>Brilliant.  The LG15 vlog makes complete sense now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-100695</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 04:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-100695</guid>
		<description>How does noone these two kids know blow their cover?  They surely went to school with other kids who would rat them out!  The most amazing thing about this hoax is not how good a fake they&#039;ve done, it&#039;s how they&#039;ve managed to keep a lid on their identities.  Way to go kids!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does noone these two kids know blow their cover?  They surely went to school with other kids who would rat them out!  The most amazing thing about this hoax is not how good a fake they&#8217;ve done, it&#8217;s how they&#8217;ve managed to keep a lid on their identities.  Way to go kids!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: East</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-100495</link>
		<dc:creator>East</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-100495</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s all a class project for film school.  To somebody else&#039;s point, youtube might have helped to set this all up as a publicity stunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s all a class project for film school.  To somebody else&#8217;s point, youtube might have helped to set this all up as a publicity stunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-100328</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-100328</guid>
		<description>Bob, I concluded that as well upon driving home; the Lonelygirl15 phenomenon coincides with the new advertisement-based revenue plan for YouTube. So she&#039;s not selling anything than YouTube itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, I concluded that as well upon driving home; the Lonelygirl15 phenomenon coincides with the new advertisement-based revenue plan for YouTube. So she&#8217;s not selling anything than YouTube itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-99651</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 04:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-99651</guid>
		<description>Hasn&#039;t anyone tied in the reason for the &quot;fake&quot; story to youtube?..I never heard or went to youtube before all this and now I&#039;m hooked on the site (AHA!) I&#039;ve spent all my free time looking at people&#039;s videos and have even posted my own since reading about lonelygirl...by the way. I&#039;m hooked on her personality. It&#039;s entertaining, but I think youtube is behind this. Whatever the case, it&#039;s fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hasn&#8217;t anyone tied in the reason for the &#8220;fake&#8221; story to youtube?..I never heard or went to youtube before all this and now I&#8217;m hooked on the site (AHA!) I&#8217;ve spent all my free time looking at people&#8217;s videos and have even posted my own since reading about lonelygirl&#8230;by the way. I&#8217;m hooked on her personality. It&#8217;s entertaining, but I think youtube is behind this. Whatever the case, it&#8217;s fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-99610</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 03:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-99610</guid>
		<description>Has anyone noticed the sound quality? It doesn&#039;t matter where they are standing or how far away from the &#039;webcam&#039; there voices are picked up beautifully. Does this mean that they are using some good microphone equipment or do most webcam setups have that good a range?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone noticed the sound quality? It doesn&#8217;t matter where they are standing or how far away from the &#8216;webcam&#8217; there voices are picked up beautifully. Does this mean that they are using some good microphone equipment or do most webcam setups have that good a range?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-99385</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-99385</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s scripted and it&#039;s a hoax. But it&#039;s very entertaining. 

1) Her parents are religious and strict, well if they really were, she wouldn&#039;t even have a door in her room(technically). She wouldn&#039;t be allowed to be with Daniel in her room at all (like someone posted before) and she wouldn&#039;t even be allowed to have a computer with internet in her room and a webcam! 
2) Her eyes are moving as if she was reading something ( someone posted this before).
3) The lights
4) People say she&#039;s smart, but yea I&#039;m sure she is smart in her own ways, but she reads books before she tries to do something. I mean, a smart person(like truly smart) would know something without having to do some &quot;research&quot;. 

I don&#039;t think a TV production is under this, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s scripted and it&#8217;s a hoax. But it&#8217;s very entertaining. </p>
<p>1) Her parents are religious and strict, well if they really were, she wouldn&#8217;t even have a door in her room(technically). She wouldn&#8217;t be allowed to be with Daniel in her room at all (like someone posted before) and she wouldn&#8217;t even be allowed to have a computer with internet in her room and a webcam!<br />
2) Her eyes are moving as if she was reading something ( someone posted this before).<br />
3) The lights<br />
4) People say she&#8217;s smart, but yea I&#8217;m sure she is smart in her own ways, but she reads books before she tries to do something. I mean, a smart person(like truly smart) would know something without having to do some &#8220;research&#8221;. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think a TV production is under this, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Population Statistic</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-99309</link>
		<dc:creator>Population Statistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-99309</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PARIS DOES YOUTUBE&lt;/strong&gt;

If YouTube hadnt already jumped the shark with that whole lonelygirl15 imbroglio, Id say cavorting with Paris Hilton easily put the latest Internet wunderkind airborne.

The video is an example of what the company calls participatory video ads,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PARIS DOES YOUTUBE</strong></p>
<p>If YouTube hadnt already jumped the shark with that whole lonelygirl15 imbroglio, Id say cavorting with Paris Hilton easily put the latest Internet wunderkind airborne.</p>
<p>The video is an example of what the company calls participatory video ads,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-98882</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-98882</guid>
		<description>The Wikipedia squabble looks mighty funny to me. Like legitimacy matters on the InterWeb...

&lt;a href=&quot;http://imdb.com/title/tt0297494/quotes&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;To paraphrase Master Shake&lt;/a&gt;: You&#039;re all yo-yo&#039;s. Shut up, ya yo-yo&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wikipedia squabble looks mighty funny to me. Like legitimacy matters on the InterWeb&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0297494/quotes" rel="nofollow">To paraphrase Master Shake</a>: You&#8217;re all yo-yo&#8217;s. Shut up, ya yo-yo&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-98688</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 04:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-98688</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lonelygirl15&quot;&gt;The Wikipedia discussion&lt;/a&gt; has grown to enormous proportions. I have it linked in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97717&quot;&gt;my Trackback three comments above&lt;/a&gt;. It seems to be a battle between those of us who think it is, at the very least, a sizable enough controversy to warrant a Wikipedia article, and those who consider only their arbitrary interests worthy of inclusion in their virtua-tome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lonelygirl15">The Wikipedia discussion</a> has grown to enormous proportions. I have it linked in <a href="http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97717">my Trackback three comments above</a>. It seems to be a battle between those of us who think it is, at the very least, a sizable enough controversy to warrant a Wikipedia article, and those who consider only their arbitrary interests worthy of inclusion in their virtua-tome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-98567</link>
		<dc:creator>shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-98567</guid>
		<description>i showed a couple of her videos to a friend of mine yesterday, and she noticed that the dialogue was scripted. in other words, she saw the LG15&#039;s eyes tracking. &quot;like a news reader, she&#039;s very good though.&quot;

of course this alone doesn&#039;t prove too much, but i can&#039;t say i&#039;ve ever seen a scripted video blog before. usually people just rant on instead of reading from a page. i don&#039;t know what their motives are, but as far as i&#039;m concerned it&#039;s a hoax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i showed a couple of her videos to a friend of mine yesterday, and she noticed that the dialogue was scripted. in other words, she saw the LG15&#8217;s eyes tracking. &#8220;like a news reader, she&#8217;s very good though.&#8221;</p>
<p>of course this alone doesn&#8217;t prove too much, but i can&#8217;t say i&#8217;ve ever seen a scripted video blog before. usually people just rant on instead of reading from a page. i don&#8217;t know what their motives are, but as far as i&#8217;m concerned it&#8217;s a hoax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wackattack</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97881</link>
		<dc:creator>wackattack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97881</guid>
		<description>when she turns 18 and were to put out porn, she&#039;d make billions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when she turns 18 and were to put out porn, she&#8217;d make billions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Journeys of Jack Tripper</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97717</link>
		<dc:creator>Journeys of Jack Tripper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97717</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Irony? &#124; The Lonelygirl15 debate&lt;/strong&gt;

In what is certain to ignite a fire in his Wikipedia-hating soul, Costa&#039;s blog is being used as justification for the existence of an article on... Wikipedia. The issue? The great Lonelygirl15 debate. As in active discussion on CT&#039;s original...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Irony? | The Lonelygirl15 debate</strong></p>
<p>In what is certain to ignite a fire in his Wikipedia-hating soul, Costa&#8217;s blog is being used as justification for the existence of an article on&#8230; Wikipedia. The issue? The great Lonelygirl15 debate. As in active discussion on CT&#8217;s original&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Garfield's Off On A Tangent</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97649</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Garfield's Off On A Tangent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 03:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97649</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;LonelyGirl15 Real or Fake?&lt;/strong&gt;

The Great LonelyGirl15 Debate. ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>LonelyGirl15 Real or Fake?</strong></p>
<p>The Great LonelyGirl15 Debate. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97527</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97527</guid>
		<description>I think it could be fake or real.. the hat could fall either way so to speak. The vide of them &quot;hiking&quot; focuses mostly, on her leading to a plot of daniel &quot;liking&quot; her and her not liking him back. So great for younger audiences which leads me to belive it&#039;s fake. How come we never see outside the room besides the hiking scene, daniel has a camera after all.. i mean im sure they can go to the kitchen. So that leads me to think it&#039;s just a little set.
Idk belive what you will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it could be fake or real.. the hat could fall either way so to speak. The vide of them &#8220;hiking&#8221; focuses mostly, on her leading to a plot of daniel &#8220;liking&#8221; her and her not liking him back. So great for younger audiences which leads me to belive it&#8217;s fake. How come we never see outside the room besides the hiking scene, daniel has a camera after all.. i mean im sure they can go to the kitchen. So that leads me to think it&#8217;s just a little set.<br />
Idk belive what you will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tribe.net: www.populationstatistic.com</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97506</link>
		<dc:creator>tribe.net: www.populationstatistic.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97506</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The lonelygirl15 phenomenon and debate&lt;/strong&gt;

Is anyone here familiar with the Lonelygirl15 YouTube debate?  (I have a show...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The lonelygirl15 phenomenon and debate</strong></p>
<p>Is anyone here familiar with the Lonelygirl15 YouTube debate?  (I have a show&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BonelyGirl15</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97466</link>
		<dc:creator>BonelyGirl15</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97466</guid>
		<description>If Lonely Girl isn&#039;t talking to Daniel at all, and if he is the &quot;computer genuis&quot; that helps her edit all the videos, etc, then why is her video about not talking to Daniel so well edited?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Lonely Girl isn&#8217;t talking to Daniel at all, and if he is the &#8220;computer genuis&#8221; that helps her edit all the videos, etc, then why is her video about not talking to Daniel so well edited?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sk</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97426</link>
		<dc:creator>sk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97426</guid>
		<description>it never felt complete &quot;real&quot; but the aha moment was when I saw daniel trying to light candles on what looked like a shrine to some deity shown in a picture on the wall behind the candles... freeze the video, rewind to 1:52, and sure enough... it&#039;s a famous picture of Aleister Crowley... occultist, Wiccan Priest, drug user, racist, and founder of the church of Thelema...  it&#039;s a freakin TV show. o well, fun anyway</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it never felt complete &#8220;real&#8221; but the aha moment was when I saw daniel trying to light candles on what looked like a shrine to some deity shown in a picture on the wall behind the candles&#8230; freeze the video, rewind to 1:52, and sure enough&#8230; it&#8217;s a famous picture of Aleister Crowley&#8230; occultist, Wiccan Priest, drug user, racist, and founder of the church of Thelema&#8230;  it&#8217;s a freakin TV show. o well, fun anyway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Flemming</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97406</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Flemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97406</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lonelygirl15 jumps the shark&lt;/strong&gt;

Well, it was fun while it lasted. I kind of enjoyed believing that the saga of lonelygirl15 and danielbeast was the real deal. Having directed a faux documentary myself, I always enjoy seeing people do new things with the form...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lonelygirl15 jumps the shark</strong></p>
<p>Well, it was fun while it lasted. I kind of enjoyed believing that the saga of lonelygirl15 and danielbeast was the real deal. Having directed a faux documentary myself, I always enjoy seeing people do new things with the form&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger_wilk_0</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97365</link>
		<dc:creator>roger_wilk_0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97365</guid>
		<description>Me used to think LG15&#039;s vids were bogus &#039;til the 4-letter words suddenly got introduced.... first in an intro song and eventually by Bree herself. That&#039;s not something that would fly on MTV or WB or any of the youth-aimed networks. If Bree wants cred, she&#039;s  getting it wholesale everytime she drops an f-bomb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me used to think LG15&#8217;s vids were bogus &#8217;til the 4-letter words suddenly got introduced&#8230;. first in an intro song and eventually by Bree herself. That&#8217;s not something that would fly on MTV or WB or any of the youth-aimed networks. If Bree wants cred, she&#8217;s  getting it wholesale everytime she drops an f-bomb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: India</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97363</link>
		<dc:creator>India</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97363</guid>
		<description>Part of me really believes she is a fake because...well, it all seems to add up from things I&#039;ve read or videos I&#039;ve watched. I don&#039;t know a lot about production with videos and everything so I have to trust that the people who are saying she uses professional lighting and other techniques are telling the truth. But I do have to say, that speaking from an average viewer&#039;s point of view, the fight video sounded completely scripted to me. I don&#039;t know if that&#039;s me being weird of what, but...well, that&#039;s how it sounded. 

But then a part of me doesn&#039;t think she could be a fake because of the first video she posted. I don&#039;t know why, it just seems like because of that maybe she isn&#039;t...but then again, why not? She talks about another user, paytotheorderofofof, in her second video saying that&#039;s why she wanted to join and that makes me believe she isn&#039;t a fake all over again.

It feels like a cycle to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of me really believes she is a fake because&#8230;well, it all seems to add up from things I&#8217;ve read or videos I&#8217;ve watched. I don&#8217;t know a lot about production with videos and everything so I have to trust that the people who are saying she uses professional lighting and other techniques are telling the truth. But I do have to say, that speaking from an average viewer&#8217;s point of view, the fight video sounded completely scripted to me. I don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s me being weird of what, but&#8230;well, that&#8217;s how it sounded. </p>
<p>But then a part of me doesn&#8217;t think she could be a fake because of the first video she posted. I don&#8217;t know why, it just seems like because of that maybe she isn&#8217;t&#8230;but then again, why not? She talks about another user, paytotheorderofofof, in her second video saying that&#8217;s why she wanted to join and that makes me believe she isn&#8217;t a fake all over again.</p>
<p>It feels like a cycle to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97158</link>
		<dc:creator>TK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97158</guid>
		<description>yikes, sorry for all the typos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yikes, sorry for all the typos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97156</link>
		<dc:creator>TK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97156</guid>
		<description>re:&gt;&gt;’m sure she IS a fake but if it’s some marketing ploy just how would that work? Wouldn’t all her popularity evaporate the instant she revealed herself and started shilling for some product?

mobeck -- yes and no. Yeah, I hear you and my bet is that there would be something of a backlash. But chances are the people invloved figure the backlash won&#039;t outweigh the &quot;data capture&quot; (how many hundreds of thousands of people have subscribed to this &quot;Girls&quot; youtube channel by now, I wonder?) adn the backlash won&#039;t outweigh the nimber of people who say, &quot;So what if it was fake. I still found it entertaining. After all, isn&#039;t TV fake?&quot; So agency or producers are obviously saying, well, if we get 100k people who drop off and say it was a lame fake, we&#039;ll still have 500k fans wo we can reach with a marketing message or who we can migrate to a series on MTV where we&#039;ll rach them with an ad message.

That&#039;s my bet. But like I said -- I&#039;m a littel jaded from sitting in meetings here in nyc where clients are always chomping at the bit wanting to reach the 18-25 demographic &quot;where they live&quot; and to do it &quot;on their side of the street, with people their age, in the language they speak, with messages that don&#039;t feel like a message.&quot;

The latest idea from one of these geniuses was, &quot;What if we had a series of blogs online, and we didn;t brand a thing about them. The only branding message was the kid who was powering the blog had to casually mention our product once a month, and the blog would be archived by month?&quot;

I don&#039;t know if lonely girl is going to turn out to be a gimmick that launches a TV series, or if it&#039;s a gimmick that is simply developing real estate online that can be sold to advertisisers at teh peak of it&#039;s popularity, or both, but I guarantee you it&#039;s a gimmick.

TK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re:&gt;&gt;’m sure she IS a fake but if it’s some marketing ploy just how would that work? Wouldn’t all her popularity evaporate the instant she revealed herself and started shilling for some product?</p>
<p>mobeck &#8212; yes and no. Yeah, I hear you and my bet is that there would be something of a backlash. But chances are the people invloved figure the backlash won&#8217;t outweigh the &#8220;data capture&#8221; (how many hundreds of thousands of people have subscribed to this &#8220;Girls&#8221; youtube channel by now, I wonder?) adn the backlash won&#8217;t outweigh the nimber of people who say, &#8220;So what if it was fake. I still found it entertaining. After all, isn&#8217;t TV fake?&#8221; So agency or producers are obviously saying, well, if we get 100k people who drop off and say it was a lame fake, we&#8217;ll still have 500k fans wo we can reach with a marketing message or who we can migrate to a series on MTV where we&#8217;ll rach them with an ad message.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my bet. But like I said &#8212; I&#8217;m a littel jaded from sitting in meetings here in nyc where clients are always chomping at the bit wanting to reach the 18-25 demographic &#8220;where they live&#8221; and to do it &#8220;on their side of the street, with people their age, in the language they speak, with messages that don&#8217;t feel like a message.&#8221;</p>
<p>The latest idea from one of these geniuses was, &#8220;What if we had a series of blogs online, and we didn;t brand a thing about them. The only branding message was the kid who was powering the blog had to casually mention our product once a month, and the blog would be archived by month?&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if lonely girl is going to turn out to be a gimmick that launches a TV series, or if it&#8217;s a gimmick that is simply developing real estate online that can be sold to advertisisers at teh peak of it&#8217;s popularity, or both, but I guarantee you it&#8217;s a gimmick.</p>
<p>TK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mobeck</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97113</link>
		<dc:creator>mobeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 14:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97113</guid>
		<description>One of her most recent was about her upbringing: her parents supposedly moved around from Germany to New Zealand, then Australia, and back to the US -- so how is it she sounds like she was born &amp; raised in SoCal, USA?

I&#039;m sure she IS a fake but if it&#039;s some marketing ploy just how would that work?  Wouldn&#039;t all her popularity evaporate the instant she revealed herself and started shilling for some product?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of her most recent was about her upbringing: her parents supposedly moved around from Germany to New Zealand, then Australia, and back to the US &#8212; so how is it she sounds like she was born &amp; raised in SoCal, USA?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure she IS a fake but if it&#8217;s some marketing ploy just how would that work?  Wouldn&#8217;t all her popularity evaporate the instant she revealed herself and started shilling for some product?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97057</link>
		<dc:creator>TK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 05:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97057</guid>
		<description>Oh, wait...HERE YOU GO! A sixteen year-old girl keeping it real registers her site by proxy to protect her identity!? Uh, I&#039;m 38, have two sites, am pretty tech savvy and the thought of registering by proxy to hide my contact infor NEVER EVEN OCCURED TO ME.

Registrant:
Domains by Proxy, Inc.

DomainsByProxy.com
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States

Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: LONELYGIRL15.COM
Created on: 12-May-06
Expires on: 12-May-07
Last Updated on: 06-Jul-06

Administrative Contact:
Private, Registration</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, wait&#8230;HERE YOU GO! A sixteen year-old girl keeping it real registers her site by proxy to protect her identity!? Uh, I&#8217;m 38, have two sites, am pretty tech savvy and the thought of registering by proxy to hide my contact infor NEVER EVEN OCCURED TO ME.</p>
<p>Registrant:<br />
Domains by Proxy, Inc.</p>
<p>DomainsByProxy.com<br />
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353<br />
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260<br />
United States</p>
<p>Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (<a href="http://www.godaddy.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.godaddy.com</a>)<br />
Domain Name: LONELYGIRL15.COM<br />
Created on: 12-May-06<br />
Expires on: 12-May-07<br />
Last Updated on: 06-Jul-06</p>
<p>Administrative Contact:<br />
Private, Registration</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97056</link>
		<dc:creator>TK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 05:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-97056</guid>
		<description>Gurantee you it&#039;s a marketing effort working toward an unveiling. I don&#039;t know...call me cynical from working in New York advertising and marketing agencies, but it&#039;s just so CLEARLY cut by a 30+ year old male. 

A big brand, a small agency, a lot of non-disclosure forms. Mark my words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gurantee you it&#8217;s a marketing effort working toward an unveiling. I don&#8217;t know&#8230;call me cynical from working in New York advertising and marketing agencies, but it&#8217;s just so CLEARLY cut by a 30+ year old male. </p>
<p>A big brand, a small agency, a lot of non-disclosure forms. Mark my words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blair Witch Project??</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-96972</link>
		<dc:creator>Blair Witch Project??</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 12:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-96972</guid>
		<description>What about the picture of Aleister Crowley???  It&#039;s like the super conservative parents are grooming her and Daniel for something?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thelema</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the picture of Aleister Crowley???  It&#8217;s like the super conservative parents are grooming her and Daniel for something?</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thelema" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thelema</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 15-Minute Hipster</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-96864</link>
		<dc:creator>The 15-Minute Hipster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 01:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-96864</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Things Each Not Important Enough to Have Their Own Post&lt;/strong&gt;

... You know how, for some reason people care that that dumb Youtube girl is some sort of viral marketing thing (which you can&#039;t even debate, she&#039;s a terrible actress and I&#039;m pretty sure most home-schooled girls with strict parents don&#039;t have a professional makeup artist coming in and doing them up every day)? Well anyway, wouldn&#039;t it be great if it was a marketing thing by some religious homeschooling organization to try and convince everyone that they&#039;re &quot;just like you and me&quot;?

Or maybe it&#039;s a Snakes on a Plane tie-in. ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Things Each Not Important Enough to Have Their Own Post</strong></p>
<p>&#8230; You know how, for some reason people care that that dumb Youtube girl is some sort of viral marketing thing (which you can&#8217;t even debate, she&#8217;s a terrible actress and I&#8217;m pretty sure most home-schooled girls with strict parents don&#8217;t have a professional makeup artist coming in and doing them up every day)? Well anyway, wouldn&#8217;t it be great if it was a marketing thing by some religious homeschooling organization to try and convince everyone that they&#8217;re &#8220;just like you and me&#8221;?</p>
<p>Or maybe it&#8217;s a Snakes on a Plane tie-in. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-96250</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 02:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-96250</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe she is professional, however, her eyebrows are *very* professional. Most of the time I&#039;m so mesmerized that I can tolerate the ramblings of a female teenager ... hated it when I was a teenager and hate it even more now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe she is professional, however, her eyebrows are *very* professional. Most of the time I&#8217;m so mesmerized that I can tolerate the ramblings of a female teenager &#8230; hated it when I was a teenager and hate it even more now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-95866</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-95866</guid>
		<description>I think it matters because people are starting to get emotionally invested in the life of this girl, and thus it becomes almost like the Frey situation.

Except this one is being hoisted on us by a corporation, which is way worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it matters because people are starting to get emotionally invested in the life of this girl, and thus it becomes almost like the Frey situation.</p>
<p>Except this one is being hoisted on us by a corporation, which is way worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-95720</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 03:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-95720</guid>
		<description>But you know, I&#039;ve been reading on other sites too, and there are some people making good points: this is youtube, this is a website were anybody can upload anything they like (almost anyway). Why do people go to such website? To entertain themselves... does it really matter if it&#039;s staged professionally or just some teens having fun... ultimately, many people are watching it, and they aren&#039;t even paying. I mean it is entertaining-- and that&#039;s a big part of what youtube is about...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But you know, I&#8217;ve been reading on other sites too, and there are some people making good points: this is youtube, this is a website were anybody can upload anything they like (almost anyway). Why do people go to such website? To entertain themselves&#8230; does it really matter if it&#8217;s staged professionally or just some teens having fun&#8230; ultimately, many people are watching it, and they aren&#8217;t even paying. I mean it is entertaining&#8211; and that&#8217;s a big part of what youtube is about&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RM</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-95681</link>
		<dc:creator>RM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 23:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-95681</guid>
		<description>Something I can not make up my mind about is the picture on her wall above the bookshelf.  In the episode where lonelygirl tries to make Daniel tell her what her father said, he starts to light some candles below a picture of what suspiciously looks like the occultist Aleister Crowley...  Look on google images.  Is this part of the mysterious religion?  Or is it someone really messing around with these films?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something I can not make up my mind about is the picture on her wall above the bookshelf.  In the episode where lonelygirl tries to make Daniel tell her what her father said, he starts to light some candles below a picture of what suspiciously looks like the occultist Aleister Crowley&#8230;  Look on google images.  Is this part of the mysterious religion?  Or is it someone really messing around with these films?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darien</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-95578</link>
		<dc:creator>Darien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-95578</guid>
		<description>and is it just me or do her eyes move back and forth like she&#039;s reading from a script? even if not, her lines are so well written and she is so composed when delivering them. they should have thrown in a few typical video blogger pauses or &#039;ums&#039; to throw all us sleuths off the scent. is that remark obscene?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and is it just me or do her eyes move back and forth like she&#8217;s reading from a script? even if not, her lines are so well written and she is so composed when delivering them. they should have thrown in a few typical video blogger pauses or &#8216;ums&#8217; to throw all us sleuths off the scent. is that remark obscene?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddy</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-95485</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/08/03/the-great-lonelygirl15-debate/#comment-95485</guid>
		<description>And wouldn&#039;t you ultimately need a credit card to purhcase the proxy server domain name registration - not that a 15-yr old can&#039;t have a credit card/Visa debt card, but it&#039;s just another little thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And wouldn&#8217;t you ultimately need a credit card to purhcase the proxy server domain name registration &#8211; not that a 15-yr old can&#8217;t have a credit card/Visa debt card, but it&#8217;s just another little thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
