<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BRITNEY BAZAAR BONANZA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/07/20/britney-bazaar-bonanza/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/07/20/britney-bazaar-bonanza/</link>
	<description>Read. React. Repeat.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:31:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Population Statistic</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/07/20/britney-bazaar-bonanza/#comment-295534</link>
		<dc:creator>Population Statistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 03:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/07/20/britney-bazaar-bonanza/#comment-295534</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PREGNANT MAG COVER, CHRISTINA AGUILERA EDITION...&lt;/strong&gt;

I guess Britney Spears set the baby-belly-baring bar last year, so naturally Christina Aguilera couldn&#8217;t help but respond in kind, smack on the front of the upcoming January issue of Marie Claire.
Which one is the pop-tartiest? Dead heat, I say. ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PREGNANT MAG COVER, CHRISTINA AGUILERA EDITION&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I guess Britney Spears set the baby-belly-baring bar last year, so naturally Christina Aguilera couldn&#8217;t help but respond in kind, smack on the front of the upcoming January issue of Marie Claire.<br />
Which one is the pop-tartiest? Dead heat, I say. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dustbury.com</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/07/20/britney-bazaar-bonanza/#comment-90062</link>
		<dc:creator>dustbury.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/07/20/britney-bazaar-bonanza/#comment-90062</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;You&#039;re nobody &#039;til Photoshop loves you&lt;/strong&gt;

Cathryn Michon, Grrl Genius, is drop-dead gorgeous, and it&#039;s all an illusion, she says: Yes, that is a picture of me but it is a professional retouched picture of me....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>You&#8217;re nobody &#8217;til Photoshop loves you</strong></p>
<p>Cathryn Michon, Grrl Genius, is drop-dead gorgeous, and it&#8217;s all an illusion, she says: Yes, that is a picture of me but it is a professional retouched picture of me&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/07/20/britney-bazaar-bonanza/#comment-89565</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/07/20/britney-bazaar-bonanza/#comment-89565</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;liz:&lt;/strong&gt; I guess, then, we can expect your birthday-suit cover photo on the next issue of &lt;em&gt;American Lawyer Monthly&lt;/em&gt;? There&#039;s a collectors&#039; item for you! ;)

&lt;strong&gt;CG:&lt;/strong&gt; Production-wise, it&#039;s a nightmare to run a different interior page for a different print run, especially if it&#039;s just one page. The cover&#039;s a lot easier to switch in and out (thus all those &quot;collect all four&quot; alternate covers you see on TV Guide, etc.). So it&#039;s not too surprising. I&#039;d have thought Harper&#039;s would have used a totally different photo for the alterna-cover, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>liz:</strong> I guess, then, we can expect your birthday-suit cover photo on the next issue of <em>American Lawyer Monthly</em>? There&#8217;s a collectors&#8217; item for you! <img src='http://www.populationstatistic.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>CG:</strong> Production-wise, it&#8217;s a nightmare to run a different interior page for a different print run, especially if it&#8217;s just one page. The cover&#8217;s a lot easier to switch in and out (thus all those &#8220;collect all four&#8221; alternate covers you see on TV Guide, etc.). So it&#8217;s not too surprising. I&#8217;d have thought Harper&#8217;s would have used a totally different photo for the alterna-cover, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/07/20/britney-bazaar-bonanza/#comment-88322</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/07/20/britney-bazaar-bonanza/#comment-88322</guid>
		<description>I rather expected that the newsstand cover picture would be part of the feature, that they&#039;d merely swapped the two for the two different distribution channels.  They didn&#039;t do that.

This isn&#039;t the first time &lt;i&gt;Bazaar&lt;/i&gt; has thrown alternate covers at subscribers, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rather expected that the newsstand cover picture would be part of the feature, that they&#8217;d merely swapped the two for the two different distribution channels.  They didn&#8217;t do that.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t the first time <i>Bazaar</i> has thrown alternate covers at subscribers, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liz</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/07/20/britney-bazaar-bonanza/#comment-88291</link>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/07/20/britney-bazaar-bonanza/#comment-88291</guid>
		<description>naked pregnant women are hot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>naked pregnant women are hot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/07/20/britney-bazaar-bonanza/#comment-88288</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/07/20/britney-bazaar-bonanza/#comment-88288</guid>
		<description>So you&#039;re saying the subscription cover photo is reprinted inside? Makes life easier production-wise, but odd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;re saying the subscription cover photo is reprinted inside? Makes life easier production-wise, but odd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/07/20/britney-bazaar-bonanza/#comment-88258</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/07/20/britney-bazaar-bonanza/#comment-88258</guid>
		<description>Actually, the photo spread seems to be identical in both newsstand and subscriber copies; the newsstand cover photo does not appear in the subscriber issues at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the photo spread seems to be identical in both newsstand and subscriber copies; the newsstand cover photo does not appear in the subscriber issues at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
