<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DECAY IN THE SUBURBS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/02/16/decay-in-the-suburbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/02/16/decay-in-the-suburbs/</link>
	<description>Read. React. Repeat.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:54:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Population Statistic</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/02/16/decay-in-the-suburbs/#comment-403440</link>
		<dc:creator>Population Statistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 02:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/02/16/decay-in-the-suburbs/#comment-403440</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;BRIGHT FLIGHT: WHITE FLIGHT REVERSAL?...&lt;/strong&gt;

&#8220;A new image of urban America is in the making&#8221;, according to Brookings Institution demographer William H. Frey in a new population study: &#8220;What used to be white flight to the suburbs is turning into ‘bright flight’ to cities that hav...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BRIGHT FLIGHT: WHITE FLIGHT REVERSAL?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;A new image of urban America is in the making&#8221;, according to Brookings Institution demographer William H. Frey in a new population study: &#8220;What used to be white flight to the suburbs is turning into ‘bright flight’ to cities that hav&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Population Statistic</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/02/16/decay-in-the-suburbs/#comment-382079</link>
		<dc:creator>Population Statistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/02/16/decay-in-the-suburbs/#comment-382079</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;FROM REPUBLICAN TO DEMOCRAT IN THE FIRST SUBURBS...&lt;/strong&gt;

With the White House at stake this year, the latest round of voter registration brought a fairly major shift in the party demographics in New York State: Several former Republican strongholds have seen increases in the ranks of Democrats, including in ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>FROM REPUBLICAN TO DEMOCRAT IN THE FIRST SUBURBS&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>With the White House at stake this year, the latest round of voter registration brought a fairly major shift in the party demographics in New York State: Several former Republican strongholds have seen increases in the ranks of Democrats, including in &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Population Statistic</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/02/16/decay-in-the-suburbs/#comment-43045</link>
		<dc:creator>Population Statistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 22:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/02/16/decay-in-the-suburbs/#comment-43045</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SUPER-STRETCHING THE METRO BOUNDARIES&lt;/strong&gt;

	We already knew about more people doing the daily two-hour ride on the Metro-North trains into New York. But regularly commuting from south of Trenton?
	That&#8217;s the size of it for some workers, as their residential migration is expanding the defi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SUPER-STRETCHING THE METRO BOUNDARIES</strong></p>
<p>	We already knew about more people doing the daily two-hour ride on the Metro-North trains into New York. But regularly commuting from south of Trenton?<br />
	That&#8217;s the size of it for some workers, as their residential migration is expanding the defi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/02/16/decay-in-the-suburbs/#comment-32652</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/02/16/decay-in-the-suburbs/#comment-32652</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the weirdest aspect of Oklahoma City is that it&#039;s the largest city (by population) in two different counties, and the second largest in a third.  It is, however, the seat only of one.

This may or may not explain why Mayor Mick Cornett has been making noises about consolidating some services with adjoining municipalities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the weirdest aspect of Oklahoma City is that it&#8217;s the largest city (by population) in two different counties, and the second largest in a third.  It is, however, the seat only of one.</p>
<p>This may or may not explain why Mayor Mick Cornett has been making noises about consolidating some services with adjoining municipalities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/02/16/decay-in-the-suburbs/#comment-32651</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/02/16/decay-in-the-suburbs/#comment-32651</guid>
		<description>Where I just came from offers a similar contrast. Just like in OK, Florida&#039;s mostly flat, so there&#039;s no geography to prevent municipalities like Tampa from creeping their city limits to the county lines.

It&#039;s not uniform in Florida, though. Jacksonville became a traditional county-city combo back in the &#039;70s (or thereabouts), which does little but pump up Jax and makes it look bigger than what it really is. Miami adopted a joint county-city structure in the late &#039;90s. That was a negative action -- Miami was drowning in disfunction, so tying its governance to Dade County was basically a bailout of the city. The effect: A certain degree of &lt;em&gt;deconsolidation&lt;/em&gt;, with villages and unincorporated areas rushing to incorporate into little cities.

In effect, the &quot;first suburbs&quot; phenomenon is the urbanization of formerly suburban zones. It&#039;s just that the municipal motherships can&#039;t extend their political reach (unless, say, NYC decides to start adding boroughs...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where I just came from offers a similar contrast. Just like in OK, Florida&#8217;s mostly flat, so there&#8217;s no geography to prevent municipalities like Tampa from creeping their city limits to the county lines.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not uniform in Florida, though. Jacksonville became a traditional county-city combo back in the &#8217;70s (or thereabouts), which does little but pump up Jax and makes it look bigger than what it really is. Miami adopted a joint county-city structure in the late &#8217;90s. That was a negative action &#8212; Miami was drowning in disfunction, so tying its governance to Dade County was basically a bailout of the city. The effect: A certain degree of <em>deconsolidation</em>, with villages and unincorporated areas rushing to incorporate into little cities.</p>
<p>In effect, the &#8220;first suburbs&#8221; phenomenon is the urbanization of formerly suburban zones. It&#8217;s just that the municipal motherships can&#8217;t extend their political reach (unless, say, NYC decides to start adding boroughs&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/02/16/decay-in-the-suburbs/#comment-32646</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2006/02/16/decay-in-the-suburbs/#comment-32646</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been pondering this for a day now, and it occurs to me that maybe the reason this phenomenon isn&#039;t evident where I live is because the city has expanded so much (the advantage of living on the plains, where there are few natural barriers) that the areas which might be &quot;first suburbs&quot; to more traditional series are actually &lt;i&gt;part of the city&lt;/i&gt;.

But WWII seems to be the breakpoint regardless: prewar housing, at least on the city&#039;s north side, gets historic or at least conservation protection.  Fifties tract homes don&#039;t rate.  (My own neighborhood, three and a half miles from downtown, is atypical: it was built in the late 40s, but it&#039;s under conservation zoning, mostly because the neighborhood, before I moved there, petitioned for it.)  This has kept housing prices perhaps higher than they might have been otherwise, though I haven&#039;t noticed much of a difference in ethnic distribution.

There is, though, an age gap: by and large, I&#039;m surrounded by young couples and empty-nesters, and not much in between.  I attribute this to distrust of the city school district, even though the neighborhood school is highly regarded and competitive with schools in the &#039;burbs; real-estate agents, if they see you have school-age children, tend to send you farther from the core unless you assure them that you&#039;re doing the private-school thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been pondering this for a day now, and it occurs to me that maybe the reason this phenomenon isn&#8217;t evident where I live is because the city has expanded so much (the advantage of living on the plains, where there are few natural barriers) that the areas which might be &#8220;first suburbs&#8221; to more traditional series are actually <i>part of the city</i>.</p>
<p>But WWII seems to be the breakpoint regardless: prewar housing, at least on the city&#8217;s north side, gets historic or at least conservation protection.  Fifties tract homes don&#8217;t rate.  (My own neighborhood, three and a half miles from downtown, is atypical: it was built in the late 40s, but it&#8217;s under conservation zoning, mostly because the neighborhood, before I moved there, petitioned for it.)  This has kept housing prices perhaps higher than they might have been otherwise, though I haven&#8217;t noticed much of a difference in ethnic distribution.</p>
<p>There is, though, an age gap: by and large, I&#8217;m surrounded by young couples and empty-nesters, and not much in between.  I attribute this to distrust of the city school district, even though the neighborhood school is highly regarded and competitive with schools in the &#8216;burbs; real-estate agents, if they see you have school-age children, tend to send you farther from the core unless you assure them that you&#8217;re doing the private-school thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
