<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE SALARY CAP CRUTCH</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/11/14/the-salary-cap-crutch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/11/14/the-salary-cap-crutch/</link>
	<description>Read. React. Repeat.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:54:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Population Statistic</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/11/14/the-salary-cap-crutch/#comment-24772</link>
		<dc:creator>Population Statistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 19:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/11/14/the-salary-cap-crutch/#comment-24772</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;TRADING IN CAP COUNTRY&lt;/strong&gt;

	
It figures: Just when I bitch about how the National Hockey League&#8217;s new salary cap environment dampens trade possibilities and dooms teams to subpar seasons, the league&#8217;s GMs managed to find their trade-trigger fingers.
	And, in the proc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>TRADING IN CAP COUNTRY</strong></p>
<p>It figures: Just when I bitch about how the National Hockey League&#8217;s new salary cap environment dampens trade possibilities and dooms teams to subpar seasons, the league&#8217;s GMs managed to find their trade-trigger fingers.<br />
	And, in the proc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommy</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/11/14/the-salary-cap-crutch/#comment-22728</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/11/14/the-salary-cap-crutch/#comment-22728</guid>
		<description>Grahame is not a number one goalie...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grahame is not a number one goalie&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/11/14/the-salary-cap-crutch/#comment-22451</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 01:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/11/14/the-salary-cap-crutch/#comment-22451</guid>
		<description>My complaint isn&#039;t so much about how the Lightning decided upon this roster coming into the season, but what it can do about it now under the cap. I wasn&#039;t crazy about Feaster insisting on keeping most of last year&#039;s players all in the name of chemistry, when there were plenty of upgrade options out there; but that&#039;s the way they wanted to go, and there was solid logic behind it.

My gripe&#039;s no so much about the Bolts as it is about how the cap limits teams in general. The St. Louis Blues are an even better example: They had to gut their defense by trading Chris Pronger for very little, because most of their cash is tied up in Doug Weight and Keith Tkachuk -- two former offensive powerhouses. Now, it&#039;s hard to see them make the moves they need to make on the blueline and in goal to get back to respectability, because a trade would likely have to match up dollar-wise for cap balance. 

Of course, just after I write all this, &lt;a href=&quot;http://tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=143183&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Ducks manage to dump Sergei Fedorov&#039;s contract on the Blue Jackets&lt;/a&gt;. So the cap doesn&#039;t totally squelch trades. But it does make them harder to pull off. And we&#039;ll see if it affects the usual deadline deals that tune up playoff-bound teams.

I&#039;m not at all sold on Grahame. Stats notwithstanding, he lacks the requisite intensity. Khabby was a money goalie because he came up with the critical saves; Grahame doesn&#039;t. Without the two of them on the same team, pushing each other, they&#039;ve both suffered this year. (Khabibulin&#039;s also had to play behind a weaker defense this year.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My complaint isn&#8217;t so much about how the Lightning decided upon this roster coming into the season, but what it can do about it now under the cap. I wasn&#8217;t crazy about Feaster insisting on keeping most of last year&#8217;s players all in the name of chemistry, when there were plenty of upgrade options out there; but that&#8217;s the way they wanted to go, and there was solid logic behind it.</p>
<p>My gripe&#8217;s no so much about the Bolts as it is about how the cap limits teams in general. The St. Louis Blues are an even better example: They had to gut their defense by trading Chris Pronger for very little, because most of their cash is tied up in Doug Weight and Keith Tkachuk &#8212; two former offensive powerhouses. Now, it&#8217;s hard to see them make the moves they need to make on the blueline and in goal to get back to respectability, because a trade would likely have to match up dollar-wise for cap balance. </p>
<p>Of course, just after I write all this, <a href="http://tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=143183" rel="nofollow">the Ducks manage to dump Sergei Fedorov&#8217;s contract on the Blue Jackets</a>. So the cap doesn&#8217;t totally squelch trades. But it does make them harder to pull off. And we&#8217;ll see if it affects the usual deadline deals that tune up playoff-bound teams.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not at all sold on Grahame. Stats notwithstanding, he lacks the requisite intensity. Khabby was a money goalie because he came up with the critical saves; Grahame doesn&#8217;t. Without the two of them on the same team, pushing each other, they&#8217;ve both suffered this year. (Khabibulin&#8217;s also had to play behind a weaker defense this year.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/11/14/the-salary-cap-crutch/#comment-22402</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 19:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/11/14/the-salary-cap-crutch/#comment-22402</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think what you&#039;re seeing from the Lightning is caused by the salary cap. They&#039;re just underachieving. Last night&#039;s game against the Flyers, a team that had won six straight games, showed what this team is capable of.  

And I think keeping everyone but Khabibulin was a good call. With the new rules going into effect I think going with offense over defense was a good call. There&#039;s no telling which goalies were going to adjust to the smaller pads and scoring-minded changes. Take a look at the stats of last year&#039;s best goalies this year. Heck, take a look at our goalie last year. Grahame&#039;s GAA and SA% are both better than Khabibulin&#039;s.  

It&#039;s frustrating right now, but I think we&#039;ll be fine. I&#039;m not sure if anyone can beat Ottawa in a playoff series (more proof that in the new NHL, offense will probably win championships), but we should at least get there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think what you&#8217;re seeing from the Lightning is caused by the salary cap. They&#8217;re just underachieving. Last night&#8217;s game against the Flyers, a team that had won six straight games, showed what this team is capable of.  </p>
<p>And I think keeping everyone but Khabibulin was a good call. With the new rules going into effect I think going with offense over defense was a good call. There&#8217;s no telling which goalies were going to adjust to the smaller pads and scoring-minded changes. Take a look at the stats of last year&#8217;s best goalies this year. Heck, take a look at our goalie last year. Grahame&#8217;s GAA and SA% are both better than Khabibulin&#8217;s.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s frustrating right now, but I think we&#8217;ll be fine. I&#8217;m not sure if anyone can beat Ottawa in a playoff series (more proof that in the new NHL, offense will probably win championships), but we should at least get there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
