<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RERUNNING REALITY: THE DEBATE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/07/24/rerunning-reality-the-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/07/24/rerunning-reality-the-debate/</link>
	<description>Read. React. Repeat.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:57:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: On Television</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/07/24/rerunning-reality-the-debate/#comment-6502</link>
		<dc:creator>On Television</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/07/24/rerunning-reality-the-debate/#comment-6502</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Reality All Over Again&lt;/strong&gt;

Based on the posts I&#039;ve seen, re-runs of reality shows seem as good as the original broadcasts....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Reality All Over Again</strong></p>
<p>Based on the posts I&#8217;ve seen, re-runs of reality shows seem as good as the original broadcasts&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trumwill</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/07/24/rerunning-reality-the-debate/#comment-5776</link>
		<dc:creator>trumwill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/07/24/rerunning-reality-the-debate/#comment-5776</guid>
		<description>No argument from me. WWE is pure entertainment and I&#039;d lose respect for any sports station that picked it up. I don&#039;t think wrestling is anywhere near what it was (I haven&#039;t watched it in years), but even with less-than-stellar viewership it has the advantage of being incredibly cheap to put out there. One of the reasons I connected A (reality TV) with B (staged wrestling) is that one of the arguments for reality TV is not only the ratings, but how comparatively cheap it is to make.

The question, I guess, is whether or not it can justify taking up time on satellite. I&#039;d figure so, but people in the know haven&#039;t done it and they know more than I do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No argument from me. WWE is pure entertainment and I&#8217;d lose respect for any sports station that picked it up. I don&#8217;t think wrestling is anywhere near what it was (I haven&#8217;t watched it in years), but even with less-than-stellar viewership it has the advantage of being incredibly cheap to put out there. One of the reasons I connected A (reality TV) with B (staged wrestling) is that one of the arguments for reality TV is not only the ratings, but how comparatively cheap it is to make.</p>
<p>The question, I guess, is whether or not it can justify taking up time on satellite. I&#8217;d figure so, but people in the know haven&#8217;t done it and they know more than I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/07/24/rerunning-reality-the-debate/#comment-5775</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/07/24/rerunning-reality-the-debate/#comment-5775</guid>
		<description>My personal perception is that the wrestling rage has crested from the highs it enjoyed in the mid- and late &#039;90s. I don&#039;t know how accurate that is -- mainly based on the friends I have who used to be into it, but have since abandoned it. But I certainly don&#039;t detect the same general buzz over it these days.

Still, they sell DVDs of old Wrestlemanias, so I&#039;m sure someone (Spike TV?) will try to rerun it. 

And don&#039;t hold up ESPN Classic as an example; that channel shows sports reruns, and (no arguments, please) WWE etc. wrestling ain&#039;t a sport.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My personal perception is that the wrestling rage has crested from the highs it enjoyed in the mid- and late &#8217;90s. I don&#8217;t know how accurate that is &#8212; mainly based on the friends I have who used to be into it, but have since abandoned it. But I certainly don&#8217;t detect the same general buzz over it these days.</p>
<p>Still, they sell DVDs of old Wrestlemanias, so I&#8217;m sure someone (Spike TV?) will try to rerun it. </p>
<p>And don&#8217;t hold up ESPN Classic as an example; that channel shows sports reruns, and (no arguments, please) WWE etc. wrestling ain&#8217;t a sport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trumwill</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/07/24/rerunning-reality-the-debate/#comment-5693</link>
		<dc:creator>trumwill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/07/24/rerunning-reality-the-debate/#comment-5693</guid>
		<description>This is only sorta on-topic, but re-runing &quot;live&quot; entertainment made me think of it. I&#039;m surprised no one has tried to get mileage out of re-running WWF/WWE/WCW matches. There are a lot of archives out there and some people that they can&#039;t show today cause they&#039;ve died or severed their ties with WWE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is only sorta on-topic, but re-runing &#8220;live&#8221; entertainment made me think of it. I&#8217;m surprised no one has tried to get mileage out of re-running WWF/WWE/WCW matches. There are a lot of archives out there and some people that they can&#8217;t show today cause they&#8217;ve died or severed their ties with WWE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/07/24/rerunning-reality-the-debate/#comment-5684</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/07/24/rerunning-reality-the-debate/#comment-5684</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it&#039;s looking like I&#039;ll soon have zero reason to watch anything on TV. That&#039;s probably a good thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s looking like I&#8217;ll soon have zero reason to watch anything on TV. That&#8217;s probably a good thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/07/24/rerunning-reality-the-debate/#comment-5524</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/07/24/rerunning-reality-the-debate/#comment-5524</guid>
		<description>Fox also has a new channel called Fox Reality (http://www.foxreality.com) available now on channel 250, DirecTV. They are showing a steady stream of reality shows. COPS, The Villa, Last Comic Standing, and a few others. They plan to have more soon. Also, Fear Factor has been syndicated on local stations, I think it&#039;s WB38. My wife is a reality show junkie, so we know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox also has a new channel called Fox Reality (<a href="http://www.foxreality.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxreality.com</a>) available now on channel 250, DirecTV. They are showing a steady stream of reality shows. COPS, The Villa, Last Comic Standing, and a few others. They plan to have more soon. Also, Fear Factor has been syndicated on local stations, I think it&#8217;s WB38. My wife is a reality show junkie, so we know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
