How did the once-lowly flip-flop sandal ascend the fashion ladder? On a faulty premise:
The evolution of flip-flops from geek to chic can be traced to open-toed shoes that prodded women to abandon pantyhose, coinciding with a surge in nail salons and toe rings. Who wants to hide pretty feet? Sections of shoe began disappearing on designers’ drafting boards. Runway models paired the plebian flip-flop with bohemian smocks, then left on the footwear when they donned taffeta for evening. (emphasis mine)
Therein lies the problem: There are really not that many pretty feet out there. In fact, there are far too many downright ugly ones on display, thanks to this open-toed madness. No matter how many $75 pedicures or toerings administered, ugly feet remain ugly feet. The biggest shame of it is, most women are kidding themselves to the contrary (although I suspect that, deep down, they know they’re not pulling it off).
For the record, I eschew sandals of all types myself (not that there’s any other type of exposed men’s footwear, really). And yeah, my feet are pretty butt-ugly too. That’s why I keep them under wraps.
Comment form closed to reduce comment-spam opportunities. Sorry about the inconvenience. Please feel free to respond to this post via Trackback and/or Pingback!

RSS - Posts


Positively sandalous
It’s flip-flop season, and CT is not thrilled: There are really not that many pretty feet out there. In fact, there are far too many downright ugly ones on display,…
Trackback by dustbury.com — 06/06/2005 @ 9:01 PM
hurrah to the flip-flop. boo to ugly feet.
Comment by transience — 06/06/2005 @ 9:19 PM
OVEREXPOSED FOOT-LONGING…
It’s summer, so it’s time to let your footsies breathe a little. All while holding your breath over yet another outcropping of body-image anxiety:
Summer footwear only increases the opportunities to feel foot shame. Some of the stuffiest wo…
Trackback by Population Statistic — 08/06/2009 @ 3:52 PM