<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BABY BOB: QUIZNOS&#8217; LATEST FLUB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/01/10/baby-bob-quiznos-latest-flub/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/01/10/baby-bob-quiznos-latest-flub/</link>
	<description>Read. React. Repeat.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:54:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AdLand ad-rag.com</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/01/10/baby-bob-quiznos-latest-flub/#comment-1062</link>
		<dc:creator>AdLand ad-rag.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2005 01:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=631#comment-1062</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Quiznos dusts off Baby Bob&lt;/strong&gt;
Last year, we wondered if there were Rats in Quiznos subs with their Sponge Monkey adverts. And before that we saw raised by wolves, and even a Super Bowl ad where poor Chef Jimmy forgot his pants.

In 2004, Quiznos cited &quot;creative differences&quot; and...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Quiznos dusts off Baby Bob</strong><br />
Last year, we wondered if there were Rats in Quiznos subs with their Sponge Monkey adverts. And before that we saw raised by wolves, and even a Super Bowl ad where poor Chef Jimmy forgot his pants.</p>
<p>In 2004, Quiznos cited &#8220;creative differences&#8221; and&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommy</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/01/10/baby-bob-quiznos-latest-flub/#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=631#comment-966</guid>
		<description>By the way, the Tom Duncan quoted in your post is of no relation...  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, the Tom Duncan quoted in your post is of no relation&#8230;  <img src='http://www.populationstatistic.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommy</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/01/10/baby-bob-quiznos-latest-flub/#comment-965</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=631#comment-965</guid>
		<description>creative lottery?  I don&#039;t buy that.  For the big &quot;jackpot&quot; maybe.  But for a typical ad campaign, it&#039;s not that hard to promote your product.  It seems Quiznos wants to hit a home run, but keep striking out.  I&#039;ve never understood why corporations pay mega money for marketing, and then decide they don&#039;t like what is offered.  Let the pros do their job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>creative lottery?  I don&#8217;t buy that.  For the big &#8220;jackpot&#8221; maybe.  But for a typical ad campaign, it&#8217;s not that hard to promote your product.  It seems Quiznos wants to hit a home run, but keep striking out.  I&#8217;ve never understood why corporations pay mega money for marketing, and then decide they don&#8217;t like what is offered.  Let the pros do their job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SUBSERVIENT CHICKEN: EFFECTIVENESS STUDY Population Statistic</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/01/10/baby-bob-quiznos-latest-flub/#comment-1451</link>
		<dc:creator>SUBSERVIENT CHICKEN: EFFECTIVENESS STUDY Population Statistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=631#comment-1451</guid>
		<description>[...] s safe to say that BK is going to stick with CP+B for a while. Contrast these results with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/01/10/baby-bob-quiznos-latest-flub/&quot;&gt;the advertising ineptness of Quiznos&lt;/a&gt;: BK allows its agency t [...]&lt;/pingback&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] s safe to say that BK is going to stick with CP+B for a while. Contrast these results with <a href="http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2005/01/10/baby-bob-quiznos-latest-flub/">the advertising ineptness of Quiznos</a>: BK allows its agency t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
