<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PODCASTING: NO AUDIO FOR ME</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2004/11/11/podcasting-no-audio-for-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2004/11/11/podcasting-no-audio-for-me/</link>
	<description>Read. React. Repeat.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:32:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Population Statistic</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2004/11/11/podcasting-no-audio-for-me/#comment-29603</link>
		<dc:creator>Population Statistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 23:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=391#comment-29603</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;TAMPA BAY&#8217;S PODCASTING LANDSCAPE&lt;/strong&gt;

	Will podcasting ever play in Peoria?
	Well, the Tampa Bay area is very much akin, socially and culturally, to Middle America, and while there&#8217;s perceptible activity, podcasting is still a minority pursuit around here. So take that as a barometer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>TAMPA BAY&#8217;S PODCASTING LANDSCAPE</strong></p>
<p>	Will podcasting ever play in Peoria?<br />
	Well, the Tampa Bay area is very much akin, socially and culturally, to Middle America, and while there&#8217;s perceptible activity, podcasting is still a minority pursuit around here. So take that as a barometer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Population Statistic</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2004/11/11/podcasting-no-audio-for-me/#comment-6899</link>
		<dc:creator>Population Statistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 00:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=391#comment-6899</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PROFESSIONAL VOICE STYLING&lt;/strong&gt;

	If everyone&#8217;s so hell-bent on advancing podcasting &#8212; in spite of my objections &#8212; then they should at least do it right. &#8220;Voice styling&#8221; lessons can turn the mumbliest mofo into a vocalizing powerhouse.
	Vanity plays a big...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PROFESSIONAL VOICE STYLING</strong></p>
<p>	If everyone&#8217;s so hell-bent on advancing podcasting &#8212; in spite of my objections &#8212; then they should at least do it right. &#8220;Voice styling&#8221; lessons can turn the mumbliest mofo into a vocalizing powerhouse.<br />
	Vanity plays a big&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Population Statistic</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2004/11/11/podcasting-no-audio-for-me/#comment-5944</link>
		<dc:creator>Population Statistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=391#comment-5944</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;GATORS GO WORDPRESSING (AND PODCASTING)&lt;/strong&gt;

	The big story is that the University of Florida has rolled out podcasts on its media website.
	As with anything relating to podcasting, I&#8217;m not particularly thrilled with potential devolution in communication this move represents.
	The not-so-bi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>GATORS GO WORDPRESSING (AND PODCASTING)</strong></p>
<p>	The big story is that the University of Florida has rolled out podcasts on its media website.<br />
	As with anything relating to podcasting, I&#8217;m not particularly thrilled with potential devolution in communication this move represents.<br />
	The not-so-bi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2004/11/11/podcasting-no-audio-for-me/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2004 01:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=391#comment-417</guid>
		<description>Written gobbledygook can be identified visually within seconds and skipped over quickly; audio sludge requires me to download it, play it through a media player and spend a couple of minutes to figure out whether or not it&#039;s worth the time. No thanks.

Even if it&#039;s stuff from a blogger I already know and enjoy, that doesn&#039;t mean I want to listen to it vs. reading it, any more than I&#039;d prefer listening to the latest issue of my favorite magazine. I prefer reading stuff like blogs; I don&#039;t desire an alternate format.

Why would I want to take a blog posting off the Web and read it offline? That&#039;s the point of accessing blogs, for me: Getting them while I&#039;m online. Being able to click through to the hyperlinks they offer. All that. Audio files don&#039;t do that for me.

I&#039;m not cursed with a long commute. For the small amount of time I spend behind the wheel, I let my iPod spit out a few songs. Same goes for the instances I use my iPod during any other activity (when, if you can imagine, I can actually forgo background noise sometimes and just enjoy the silence). I don&#039;t desire the change-up with some inane amateur attempt at a talk radio episode. (I don&#039;t care for audiobooks either, for that matter.) 

It&#039;s up to individual preference, but like I said, the essence of blogging and most other Web-delivered content, in my mind, is text and images that can be absorbed at my own pace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Written gobbledygook can be identified visually within seconds and skipped over quickly; audio sludge requires me to download it, play it through a media player and spend a couple of minutes to figure out whether or not it&#8217;s worth the time. No thanks.</p>
<p>Even if it&#8217;s stuff from a blogger I already know and enjoy, that doesn&#8217;t mean I want to listen to it vs. reading it, any more than I&#8217;d prefer listening to the latest issue of my favorite magazine. I prefer reading stuff like blogs; I don&#8217;t desire an alternate format.</p>
<p>Why would I want to take a blog posting off the Web and read it offline? That&#8217;s the point of accessing blogs, for me: Getting them while I&#8217;m online. Being able to click through to the hyperlinks they offer. All that. Audio files don&#8217;t do that for me.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not cursed with a long commute. For the small amount of time I spend behind the wheel, I let my iPod spit out a few songs. Same goes for the instances I use my iPod during any other activity (when, if you can imagine, I can actually forgo background noise sometimes and just enjoy the silence). I don&#8217;t desire the change-up with some inane amateur attempt at a talk radio episode. (I don&#8217;t care for audiobooks either, for that matter.) </p>
<p>It&#8217;s up to individual preference, but like I said, the essence of blogging and most other Web-delivered content, in my mind, is text and images that can be absorbed at my own pace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Prodoehl</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2004/11/11/podcasting-no-audio-for-me/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Prodoehl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 19:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=391#comment-410</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Record your entries into MP3 format, upload it and present it as a link you could either stream or save to your drive.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nope, not quite&#8230; The whole idea is that you put it into an RSS feed, and it&#8217;s automatically downloaded and if possible, put on a portable device. The audioblog experience sucked for me until the automation in this fashion happened.</p>
<p>&#8216;Audio (and video) on the web detracts from that.&#8221;</p>
<p>So take it off the web! I spend 90 minutes each day driving, and I&#8217;m not going to be reading during that time, but I can hear a lot of interesting stuff along the way. Don&#8217;t drive much? Do you walk? Workout at a gym?</p>
<p>&#8220;If this actually catches on, I’m betting it’ll result in a bunch of mumble-mouthed monologues that are barely coherent&#8221;</p>
<p>And this is different from blogs in what way? (Besides being spoken, not written.)</p>
<p>What podcasts have you listened to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blunted</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2004/11/11/podcasting-no-audio-for-me/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>blunted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=391#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I wouldn&#039;t mind going back and recording some of my &quot;better&quot; entries as MP3s and posting them on my site... although I&#039;d HATE to hear what would happen if &quot;audioblogging&quot; ever caught on at Xanga or Livejournal :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I wouldn&#8217;t mind going back and recording some of my &#8220;better&#8221; entries as MP3s and posting them on my site&#8230; although I&#8217;d HATE to hear what would happen if &#8220;audioblogging&#8221; ever caught on at Xanga or Livejournal <img src='http://www.populationstatistic.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PODCASTING ON THE AIRWAVES Population Statistic</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2004/11/11/podcasting-no-audio-for-me/#comment-1715</link>
		<dc:creator>PODCASTING ON THE AIRWAVES Population Statistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=391#comment-1715</guid>
		<description>[...] p their iPods? Especially if they don&#8217;t want to deal with commercial interruptions? 	&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2004/11/11/podcasting-no-audio-for-me/&quot;&gt;I hold a dim view of podcasting&lt;/a&gt;, despite being one of those iP [...]&lt;/pingback&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] p their iPods? Especially if they don&#8217;t want to deal with commercial interruptions? 	<a href="http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2004/11/11/podcasting-no-audio-for-me/">I hold a dim view of podcasting</a>, despite being one of those iP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TIME&#8217;S PODCAST: STILL NO AUDIO FOR ME Population Statistic</title>
		<link>http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2004/11/11/podcasting-no-audio-for-me/#comment-1873</link>
		<dc:creator>TIME&#8217;S PODCAST: STILL NO AUDIO FOR ME Population Statistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=391#comment-1873</guid>
		<description>[...] Saturday, June 04, 2005     TIME&#8217;S PODCAST: STILL NO AUDIO FOR ME       	&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2004/11/11/podcasting-no-audio-for-me/&quot;&gt;When I trashed the whole podcasting thing&lt;/a&gt;, I did so on the ass [...]&lt;/pingback&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Saturday, June 04, 2005     TIME&#8217;S PODCAST: STILL NO AUDIO FOR ME       	<a href="http://www.populationstatistic.com/archives/2004/11/11/podcasting-no-audio-for-me/">When I trashed the whole podcasting thing</a>, I did so on the ass [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
